reading

2026 in Books: August

The books mentioned in the post in a (small) pile on a shiny wooden surface. Patterned wallpaper in the background.

The Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi - Shannon Chakraborty

This has an incredibly pretty cover, and it’s a bit of a mystery why it’s been lurking unread on my shelf for a year. It was a gift from an excellent book-recommender friend (you may remember him from Broken Light, back in June).

“...Such treasures supposedly included the kind of artifacts Falco liked, so I set up a meet.”
”And how did that go?”
”Spectacularly wrong.”
— The Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi

Sometimes you start a book, and within pages have a strong sense of “right, I’m in…”. This novel is excellent, and from the start I was pretty sure I was going to love it.

Amina al-Sirafi is, by the way, a retired pirate. Definitely retired, and 100% not about to go on another pirating adventure. Not even a little bit.

Except, you know how it is, stuff happens, one thing leads to another, and by chapter 6 we are on board the Marawati, having organised a jailbreak, killed a few people, set fire to some ships, and lied to some officials.

Honestly, this book cracks along like nobody’s business. The story is intriguing, the dialogue is smart, and the characters are great fun (if not necessarily always people you’d want to end up in a bar with).

All the action is set around the Indian Ocean, in a medieval world which feels meticulously researched. Even the magic is aligned (in so far as I understand it) to the traditions and beliefs from the era. It’s not a usual backdrop for a fantasy novel (or at least, not in my experience) and it was delightful to be dropped into an unfamiliar culture in a very accessible way.

Overall, absolutely top. And another friend spied what I was reading, and helpfully informed me that there is now a sequel. If you want a grand yarn with a good old dollop of swash, buckle, djinn, dry humour and demons, this is it. (Although if your kids want a grand yarn with swash, buckle, etc, be warned that it’s quite gory in places and has some mildly surprising sex scenes.)

Buried in Cornwall - Janie Bolitho

The end of August saw me once again at my parents’ house. My dad doesn’t actually live in a lair which is equal parts workshop, potting shed and cosy whodunnit hoard, but if you think of him like that it will probably work for narrative purposes. I scored Buried in Cornwall off one of his bookpiles (it wasn’t the ‘in’ pile, and I don’t think it was the ‘out’ pile - it might have been the ‘donated-for-the-church-bookshop’ pile, or one of the many piles headed towards friends with whom he has mutual library-sharing pacts).

“There’s no need for sarcasm, Rose. Most people prefer to distance themselves from crime of any sort.”
”But I’m not most people, am I, Jack, or you wouldn’t be here now.”
— Buried in Cornwall

I grew up reading golden age whodunnits, and have found relatively few modern writers who measure up. Although I didn’t know the name Janie Bolitho, I recognised the name of her “detective” character, Rose Trevelyan, from the back cover. Rose, I was vaguely aware, is the point-of-view character but she’s not actually Police, she’s more of interested bystander. Which is a good thing, in my view, because it means you can dispense with all the tiresome police procedural nonsense.

Sadly, this book was absolute guff. Buried in Cornwall is part of a series, and so the first chapter or two needs to catch you up with the cast of characters and the backplot. Which it does in a headlong rush of run-on sentences that were so ludicrous they actually sounded like parody.

After I settled in, I stopped noticing this (or possibly it calmed down a bit). The story trundled along with people taking weirdly obsessive interest in uninteresting details (for plot-necessitated reasons) and an awful lot of information about what people were eating and drinking.

The plot was, to be honest, a bit silly. And one of those uninteresting details turned out to be unrelated to the murder, but was instead someone with slightly shaky mental health doing something utterly bizarre for somewhat sketchy reasons. Oh, and the fact that one of the other characters had a slight psychotic break and threatened to kill Rose was just glossed over and they were all friends again by the end.

Disappointing, do not recommend.

2026 in Books: July

A stack of paperback copies of the books listed below, sitting on a rather worn-out grey carpet

It’s taken me a while to get round to writing up July’s books; life has been occurring (mostly good!)

The Four Loves - C. S. Lewis

Yes, this is the lion, witch and wardrobe guy. No, this isn’t a kids’ book. A friend had been recommending CS Lewis’ writings on matters theological and philosophical, and I found this lurking on my shelf. I suspect I picked up in a second-hand shop, and then never got round to reading it.

Even now, at whatever age, we all know the perilous charm of a shared hatred or grievance. (It is difficult not to hail as a Friend the only other man in College who really sees the faults of the Sub-Warden.)
— The Four Loves

Why did I not get around to reading it? Well. I have always aspired to be the sort of person who reads philosophy, but I am incredibly bad at it. I have to concentrate very hard, and even then I often find I’ve consumed several pages where I definitely read all the words, but have somehow accrued no actual meaning.

On top of that, even if I do feel I’m following the author’s thoughts, they rarely stick, and so I end up in the situation I am in now: I know I read the book; I’m pretty sure I found some things of value in it; I’m blowed if I can tell you what they were.

Anyway. None of this is Mr Lewis’ fault as he does, on the whole, write very clearly. He is also writing from a different time, when attitudes to gender and sexuality were different; sometimes you can almost hear him struggling to be fair, sometimes bald statements don’t sit so well with today’s views.

I did, however, find a lot of his commentary on the “four loves” - affection, friendship, eros, and charity - to be easy to read, interesting, and with some unexpected takes on human nature. His writing on romantic love, in particular, surprised me - both in his open approach to relationships, and his theories around why sex is rarely the demon it can be made out to be. (I have since learned from Wikipedia that the essays were based on US radio talks, which were criticised in the late fifties for “their frankness about sex”.)

I do feel, though, that perhaps I should have taken notes. Most of the things that struck me as valuable have not, a month later, stayed with me.

Never Whistle at Night - Edited by Shane Hawk and Theodore C. Van Alst Jr.

This book is subtitled “An Indigenous Dark Fiction Anthology”. I bought it while on holiday in the Pacific North West almost two years ago (so the place it is indigenous to is North America). I like the idea of buying a book with some form of local connection when on holiday, and the excellent Powell’s City of Books in Portland had shelves and shelves of them for me to choose from.

Everywhere he walked, he found arrowheads and crystals, snakes and snails, scanning constantly and missing nothing. He smoked like a chimney. He smiled a lot but hated photos, and in the few that were taken he’s just the top of a bowed head.
— Never Whistle at Night

One of the lovely things about short story anthologies is the variety, and bite-sized-ness. You can pick up a book, read a complete story, and still not be getting to bed too late on a schoolnight. The voices are different, the settings are different - and if there’s a story you don’t enjoy so much? Never mind, there’ll be a new one along in a couple of pages.

There’s a lot of great writing to enjoy in this collection. Some of the descriptions have stuck with me really vividly - like Joe’s reaction to the blazingly sexy Cam turning up at the start of Conley Lyons’ Navajos Don’t Wear Elk Teeth, or the narrator’s flat delivery of the facts of her brother’s death in Carson Faust’s Eulogy for a Brother, Resurrected.

There’s also a lot of variety in the “dark” - dark magic, political darkness, personal trauma and just plain unsettling. One of the stories I’d file under “didn’t enjoy so much” seemed a little too close to a catalogue of tortures inflicted on a person for fairly vague reasons. My favourite (Kate Hart’s Uncle Robert Rides the Lightning) was a deeply weird cosmic tail of a man looking out for his kin. I’m pretty sure there’s something for everyone.

Reading this also made me uncomfortably aware how “white” my reading list usually is. I must make more effort to pick up books written from a wider range of viewpoints.

Also: the physical book itself is weirdly… floppy. It falls open, naturally, into an easy-to-read position. Is this some wizardry of American book-binding? Can we have books in the UK that are this obliging, please?

Station Eleven - Emily St John Mandel

This book plopped most unexpectedly through my letterbox in mid-July. Friend C had enjoyed it, and put in the post with a letter as she thought I might like it, too. (This, by the way, is something C has been doing for years, and it is an utterly fabulous habit. Next time you finish a book, consider sending it to a bookish friend. Who doesn’t love an unexpected book and letter in the post?)

“It’s just an awful thing to do.”
”I don’t think I’m an awful person,” Elizabeth says.
”No-one ever thinks they’re awful, even people who really, actually are. It’s some sort of survival mechanism.”
— Station Eleven

C described Station Eleven as being “about a pandemic (sort of), but not our pandemic”. It opens with the spread of a highly-contagious, deadly flu virus sweeping across the world and generally shutting down civilisation as we know it. It was published in 2014. (And quite frankly, given how the book-pandemic plays out, I’m pretty glad I hadn’t read it when Covid kicked off.)

We all know how post-apocalyptic books go, no? There will be foraging for food and equipment, trying to get things working, probably some stockpiling of weapons, maybe marauding bands… honestly, fairly tedious. The thing that makes Station Eleven amazing is that it has all of those, but they’re sort of nothing to do with the plot. They’re the backdrop, sure, and they have quite an impact on the characters, but they are fundamentally not what the book is about.

What it is about is people, and relationships, and the role of art in a society that is scrabbling for survival. Did I mention that quite a lot of the post-apocalyptic action takes place in a travelling Shakespeare company? The writing is sharp, and beautifully observed, and incredibly compelling to read. Pretty sure I polished this off in a weekend.

2026 in Books: June

A (very) small stack of the books described in this post

I have not read a huge number of books this month but, hey, it’s an improvement on May!

The Fairy GunMother - Daniel Pennac

This book has been on my shelf for a very long time. I acquired it as part of a Reading Spa at Mr B’s Emporium in Bath. Honestly, the Reading Spa is such a delightful concept — you go to the bookshop, they sit you down in a comfy chair and give you tea and cake, and then talk to you about books for an hour before recommending books you might like.

—And Julie Corrençon had been drugged before she was depontated.
—Depontated?
—A word I’ve coined, Sir, with reference to the verb ‘defenestrate’.
— The Fairy Gunmother

Unfortunately, it seems my tastes didn’t quite mesh with my Mr B’s-provided book advisor, and overall I didn’t love the books he prescribed for me. I was a little put off, and still haven’t quite finished all of them. The Fairy Gunmother is one such.

I was, therefore, not entirely surprised when I started on the book and didn’t like it all that much. I can’t quite define why: it’s got a lot of things in it that I would expect to like:

  1. it’s a whodunnit

  2. it is whimsical to the point of absurdity

  3. it contains a lot of wordplay and snappy dialogue

I can totally see why it was recommended to me. But. But.

The opening page of the book drops you straight into the middle of the action with no explanation (again, a device I wholeheartedly approve of); the reader watches an assassination, told through the thought processes of the victim by an omniscient narrator. Re-reading it now, the language is quirky, the conceit is interesting, the details hilarious… at the time, I just found it bewildering and annoying.

We then follow the progress of the investigation into this murder (and various other crimes — are they linked? are they irrelevant?) — in a style which I am going to choose to describe as extremely colourful noir, zooming in on various different characters, and often straying into reams of elaborate detail.

As I write this, I’m wondering if I ought to read it again — I suspect the plotting may actually be much cleverer that it seemed. Maybe, now I have a secure idea of the destination, I could enjoy the journey more. And, as I said, I really ought to have loved it.

Broken Light - Joanne Harris

This genuinely was a re-read. It was last year’s (or the previous year’s? what is time anyway?) birthday gift from a friend with whom I have been swapping birthday books for (horrifyingly) approximately three decades. He’s a very reliable book-recommender. I had found myself remembering part of the plot, and — once I’d figured out which book I was thinking of* — decided to take it for another spin.

Hormones are at the same time something that changes everything, and something of a joke, just as hormonal women are a joke; over-dramatic; untrustworthy.
— Broken Light

This book sets out its stall very quickly. Within the first few pages the reader encounters the idea that we’re dealing with magic, male violence, and a woman struggling with both dreadful menopausal symptoms and an unsupportive, distant husband. All of these things are exactly what you’re going to get for the rest of the book.

The story unfurls through written documents. The attributions allow us to work out that these are all “from the past”, and that “something has happened”. Some of the documents are written by someone who barely appears in the story until much later. Even now, looking up my quote for the box over there, I’ve just noticed a tiny extra surprise — some of the “extracts” are from a book published by a company the owner spends the whole book denying is a vanity press. The fact that that character published that book after the “incident” is interesting all in its own right.

And that is just the sort of thing I enjoyed about this book. There is lots of detail, there, to pick up if you care. If you have time to notice, because it’s a real page-turner — even with the ongoing depressing themes of how men treat women, how men think about women, and how little agency the central character appears to have over her life.

Despite her weird magical powers.

Which are quite simple. But also hugely complex — I think this is what made me want to re-read this, the fact the narrative is so intensely layered with different messages, and different aspects of the human existence.

Broken Light is, also, rather delightfully arranged like a playlist, with a song associated to each section. I wish more writers would do that, I love it. Strong recommend on this one.


*and if anyone can figure out that book about some sisters, which has a lot of references to the plant honesty, and where someone eventually drowns themselves after taking hemlock, I’d love to read that one again, too. The way my brain retains books does not facilitate easy Googling.

2026 in Books: May

A rather tatty grey rectangle of carpet, containing an extremely conspicuous absence of books.

Er, hello.

Well.

This is embarrassing.

You may remember that, in order to spur myself into reading more this year, I committed to blogging each month about the books that I’d read. Perhaps you’re ahead of me here. In May I finished reading… no books. This is a useful reminder to myself that I do have to deliberately make sure I find time for reading.

Things I have done this month include: read short stories online, read magazine articles, read news articles, begun - but not finished - a book. I have not forgotten how to consume words with my eyeballs.

In lieu of any book reviews, I can tell you what a lovely time I had at the most recent Liminal Tales event in London. I read my story The Organist and the Old Man - but once that was all over and done with, I sneaked into the audience to listen to a very strong set of stories from the other four authors.

Stuart Hardy is a Liminal Tales regular, and he always delivers exceptional horror stories. The Intruder was a quiet, insidious sort of story - made all the creepier by Stuart’s typical low-key delivery. The story’s available in an anthology if that sounds like your thing.

Paul M. Bradley read My Private War, which is exactly the sort of story I find incredibly hard to read out loud: one which is almost entirely dialogue, relying only on “voice” to let the reader figure out what’s going on. Fortunately, Paul is a real, proper actor who can easily carry two characters at once - and has the timing to deliver the story’s twists.

James Morgan Belcher (my linking is all over the joint here, depending on what seems to be people’s most prominent online presence…) has often been at Liminal Tales as a punter, but this was the first time I’ve head one of his stories. Bad Mime Makeup was a wonderfully weird fever-dream of a story, with some really gorgeous bits of description in it.

The final story, though, was my favourite: Emma Burnett’s story 25 Peppercorns. Read by actor Freya Bowen, the tale cleverly uses the food and recipes a family shares to talk about intergenerational trauma. The link will take you to a freely-available version of the story in Mythaxis Magazine, and I highly recommend clicking on it and settling down for a great read.

And now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go and pick up a book, so my next blog post isn’t quite so awkward…

2026 in Books: April

All books mentioned in the text, in a pile on the window sill. The Thomas de Quincey is a tatty hardback whose title id on a torn label that can barely be read. The other two look new.

On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts - Thomas de Quincey

I’m going to put my cards on the table straight away: this is a re-read, and this book is much, much stranger than I remember.

...against Locke’s philosophy, in particular, I think it an unanswerable objection (if we needed any), that although he carried his throat about with him in this world for seventy-two years, no man ever condescended to cut it.
— On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts

On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts contains three essays. The first is presented as the transcript of a speech given to “The Society of Connoisseurs in Murder”. It includes a brief history of murder (beginning with Cain), and a dissection of some “recent” (at time of writing, in the early nineteenth century) murders. The cases are weighed and measured for aesthetic merits and virtues; the murderers’ choices are critiqued, praised, or mocked. The essay also includes a special section on the murder of philosophers (with reference to their respective philosophies) - in fact, I’ve seen the whole thing described as “a prolonged satire of Kant's aesthetic theory”, and I worry that some of the finer points might have whizzed right over my head.

The second essay is a defence of the first, with lengthy detours into the reaction of The Society as a whole (and one member in particular) to the Ratcliffe Highway murders. The third is a straight-up true crime account (though not, according to Wikipedia, an especially accurate one) of those same murders.

It is somewhat worrying to note that when I bought this book (in a long-gone second-hand bookshop in Hastings) and read it for the first time, I couldn’t easily look up the Ratcliffe Highway murders, because Wikipedia had not yet been invented.

I remember this book as being very funny - and parts of it are. The author, however, does have that maddening tendency of nineteenth-century writers to assume that his readers can all follow his erudition effortlessly, and he sprinkles Latin, Greek and French quotations liberally without translation. I looked some of them up, then lost patience. In general, the writing style veers around between turgid and outright silly, passing all stations in between, and I didn’t enjoy it as much as I remember doing the previous time.

The Empress of Salt and Fortune - Nghi Vo

I am pretty sure that this was a gift, and I’m embarrassed to note that I have forgotten from whom.

Her hair was cropped close to her head like a nun’s, but she’d cut strange patterns into it like sheared velvet, and her eyes were as narrow as her smile was wide.
— The Empress of Salt and Fortune

Being a novella, it’s a quick read - but is absolutely delightful.

The story gives almost no background before we are suddenly in right there, with a cleric who is collecting stories of a dead empress from one of the empress’ servants. In each chapter, we hear a little of what the cleric is up to in the here-and-now, then we slide into yet another of Rabbit’s tales of the former empress.

Without that background, the reader is left to put together the pieces of the story themselves - and it’s impressive that the whole thing still feels satisfying, and I never felt “lost” in the loose, disjointed narrative.

The culture is not precisely defined, but seems to borrow elements from various real-world Asian cultures, with a hefty dose of fantasy and magic mixed in. The writing is beautiful, and very direct, with very vivid descriptions conjured up from tiny phrases.

This novella feels like a small, polished jewel - and will definitely bear a re-read.

The Fourth Bear - Jasper Fforde

Take a step closer and my associate hiding over there will tranq your fuzzy butt and we can talk it over at the station. Me with a cup of tea and a chocolate digestive, and you with a splitting headache and a numb arse. Your choice.
— The Fourth Bear

I have been extremely busy during April, both in my day-job and in my real life. Towards the end of the month I had got to the point of wanting something very undemanding to read.

In steps Jasper Fforde.

I’ve read (and enjoyed) some of his Thursday Next books, but this is from the Nursery Crime series, in which DCI Jack Spratt investigates crimes involving Persons of Dubious Reality. It is, however, set loosely in the same world as Thursday Next - which has the added bonus that most of the magic- and mayhem-riddled action takes place in Reading. I worked in Reading for more than a decade, and while murderous nursery rhyme characters are already quite funny, they’re much funnier when they’re rampaging through, say, the Oracle shopping centre.

There is, in general, something quite endearing about Jasper Fforde novels. They’re deeply silly, and they know it. The characters occasionally address the reader directly, the plot cheerfully filches devices from all over the place (and takes them to extremes), and poor old Jack Spratt constantly has to battle government bureaucracy, circumvent department funding problems, and keep his case from straying too far into noir pastiche.

I think it would easily be possible to have too much of this sort of thing, but a little bit when required is just the ticket.

2026 in Books: February

Well, having started strong with 4 proper-length novels in January, February has been a little busy, so I’ve read rather less.

In my defence, I finished a book on Sunday, so if February was a proper-length month I’d have squeezed in another. Ah well, at least I’ve got a headstart on March!

A small pile of all the books mentioned in the post, piled up on a grey carpet.

Project Hail Mary - Andy Weir

Project Hail Mary was a Christmas present from one of my most reliable book-choosing friends. She usually skews more towards fantasy (at least in her presents to me), so I was mildly surprised to find myself unwrapping what was patently going to be reasonably hard sci-fi. And set in space. I often don’t get on well with books set in space. But, like I said, she’s very reliable.

I have four rough circles, each a couple of inches across. Yes, inches. When I’m stressed out, I revert to imperial units. It’s hard to be an American, okay?
— Project Hail Mary

And everyone liked The Martian, right?

It was, of course, fine. The books cracks along at a tremendous pace, manages not to have vast tracts of turgid prose about the insides of spaceships, and is broadly speaking very silly.

Dr Grace - our unlikely space hero, suffering from amnesia and inexplicably solo on a large spaceship - has a very lightweight, chatty narration style that is incredibly easy to read.

We do, over the course of his adventures, get moderately vast tracts of space logistics, some of which I found a little difficult to follow - but I think that’s on me. I usually can’t keep up if anyone describes a layout more complicated than a small potting shed.

The story does use the same device over and over again: Dr Grace has a problem! Dr Grace can jury-rig himself a solution using a thing that is already on the ship, some alien tech and a lot of maths! He is basically a one-man A-Team In Space.

But… while I wouldn’t like to stand bail for all the solutions being completely plausible, they are plausible enough. They feel like a bunch of little puzzles with very satisfying conclusions. Anyway, the cover-blurb says Tim Peake liked the book, which seems good enough to me.

Despite my space-based misgivings, this book was massive fun.

Once Upon A Tome - Oliver Darkshire

This book - also a Christmas present - is subtitled “The Misadventures of a Rare Bookseller”. I suppose technically it is non-fiction, but it is another very quick, easy and entertaining read.

Unlike other disciplines, book cataloguing is less an art, not really a science, and more of a completely unstandardized, decentralized carnival fire.
— Once Upon A Tome

In a series of very short chapters (which are the absolute devil for making readers think “ok, just one more, then I’ll…”) the author recounts the deeply peculiar - and probably mostly true - life of an apprentice at a shop which claims to be the oldest bookshop in the world. (At least he says it did at the time, its website now claims, slightly more circumspectly, that it is “the longest-established rare book dealer in Europe”.)

If you are the sort of person who likes hanging around in second-hand bookshops, and sincerely wish to believe that all booksellers are mad as hatters, shuffling about in a sort of genteel chaos of incunabula and stuffed owls, trying to avoid both demanding customers and cursed volumes, then you should read this book.

If you know that sort of person, and never quite know what to give them as a present, give them this book.

I assume that lawyers have been involved and none of the stories are actively libellous, but there is a pleasing vibe of scurrilous gossip throughout. Grab a drink, find a comfy chair, and prepare to be entertained.

You Don’t Have To Have a Dream - Tim Minchin

Which is your job (just by the way):
To put into the world valuable ideas.
— Tim Minchin

This is yet another very quick read - as a book it’s on the slim side, but more relevantly it’s big print, and big illustrations. The content is the transcripts of three speeches Minchin has given, each one on the occasion of receiving an honorary degree. One of which is a long-form poem.

Some of it is advice on being an artist. Some of it is suggestions of how to live better. Some of it is a bit angry, and some of it is funny, and all of it is very easy to understand and expressed with a lot of heart.

It feels like it would be pretty decent life advice for a child, though it depends how comfortable you are with your child reading the word fuck occasionally.

You Say Clickbait Like It's a Bad Thing

 
 

I’ve been thinking recently about titles. Specifically, the titles that writers give short stories.

I’m embarrassed to admit that for a long time I didn’t give that much thought to titles for the stories I write. Sometimes a title springs fully-formed into mind before a story is even written - but equally often a half-written story ends up saved in a file named after a character (or an object!) in the story, and eventually that accidentally becomes the title. I mean, titles aren’t that important, right? It’s the story that counts.

Now, if you are - say - Neil Gaiman, with a vast and enthusiastic following who will leap on a new story with delight regardless of title, you can probably get away with calling your latest work any old bollocks (or, of course, Any Old Bollocks). Spoilers: I am not Neil Gaiman. My enthusiastic following is largely limited to my parents and a couple of friends. (Also, arguably, even Neil Gaiman didn’t get where he is today by publishing stories with crap titles.)

If you publish a novel then you’ve got a title, a nice illustrated jacket, and probably a cover blurb to lure people in. If you’re very lucky, bookshops will pile your novel temptingly on tables, include it in multi-buy offers or (bless every last shop that does this) post up little handwritten notes from the staff explaining why it is awesome. A short story is much more likely to appear on a website, where casual browsers have nothing but a list of titles to choose from. So the title had better get its paw in the air and yell “pick me!”

My story Granny’s Cooking was turned down a number of times before I began to wonder whether, perhaps, its title was a bit boring. It eventually appeared in print as Cook Me A Storm. Would the magazine have taken it, regardless? I’ll likely never know, but I like to think the title-change gave it a hand up.

The most intriguing title I’ve seen recently was in an an issue of Cossmass Infinities. Browsing down the contents page, I immediately clicked on Murder or a Duck by Beth Goder. What situation could possibly result in that particular choice? I wanted to know. Then I became suspicious.

Calling your story Murder or a Duck makes an implicit promise: there is going to be some sort of dilemma, dichotomy or question of identity revolving around murder (or a duck). Your fiction had better make good on that promise. Coming up with an intriguing title is easy; coming up with an intriguing title which suits the actual story and does not leave the reader feeling cheated is quite another.

(Murder or a Duck, by the way, was delightfully silly and delivered handsomely on the promise. I recommend it.)

Intrigue isn’t the only option. I’m also strangely fond of titles which tell you (in a sense) exactly what you’re getting - for example Ten Excerpts from an Annotated Bibliography on the Cannibal Women of Ratnabar Island or The Tale of the Three Beautiful Raptor Sisters, and the Prince Who Was Made of Meat. And of titles that appear to ramble on long after they ought to have stopped, like Once More Unto the Breach (But Don’t Worry, the Inflatable Swords Are Latex-Free). And titles that include fun pop culture references, like Open House on Haunted Hill

It’s fair to say that titles are capricious beasts, and that there’s no smart formula for coming up with them. They are, however, something that I’m going to give a lot more thought to in the future.

Next time you see me advertising a story on Twitter, let me know if I got it right!